ISTINYE UNIVERSITY BİLGİ PAKETİ / DERS KATALOĞU
Course Introduction and Application Information
| Course Code: | ICM117 | ||||
| Course Name: | Introduction to Interior Architecture 1 | ||||
| Semester: | Fall | ||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||
| Language of instruction: | Turkish | ||||
| Course Condition: | |||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||
| Type of course: | Compulsory Courses | ||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||
| Course Coordinator: | Dr. Öğr. Üy. BANU ÖZKAZANÇ | ||||
| Course Lecturer(s): | Asst. Prof. Banu Özkazanç | ||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Objective and Content
| Course Objectives: | This course aims to introduce a theoretical discussion ground for first-year interior architecture students as a first step for their education and to raise awareness about the intellectual and critical aspects of design education. |
| Course Content: | It is a course in which interior architecture students step into architecture and design theory. In addition to the discussions on the meaning and history of design concepts, this course will introduce the basics of the discipline of interior architecture. Throughout the semester, the concepts of perception, representation, space and body will be examined and discussed through the products and events of architecture, design and art. Additionally, the course aims to gain comprehensiveness in the practice of reading, understanding, interpreting and generating ideas about the basic concepts of modern architecture and the ability to express these ideas in writing. |
Learning Outcomes
|
The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) Beginner-level understanding of interior architecture and design concepts. 2) Grasping the basic ideas and knowledge in the fields of architecture, interior architecture, design and art. 3) Being familiar with the discussions of the topic perception of space, body-space, scale, abstraction. 4) Comprehension of concepts such as modern, modernity, premodernity, utopia, etc. on a theoretical basis. 5) Building a critical insight alongside the usual project-oriented thought. 6) Proficiency in reading, understanding, interpreting and expressing ideas in written form in the field of architecture. |
Course Flow Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | WHAT IS INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND WHAT IS NOT? Informal presentation about the operation and evaluation of the course. An introduction to Interior Architecture as a professional practice. Discussion on misconceptions. | - |
| 2) | VISION / PERCEPTION: The practice of architecture has become a “retinal architecture” of pure eye: critical reading and discussion of an anti-modern position. | READING: “The Eyes of Skin” - 1996 - Juhani Pallasmaa HOMEWORK: Visit "Dialogue in the Dark" Exhibition. |
| 3) | LOOK / SEE / PERCEIVE: The significance of senses in spatial perception; discussion through examples. | - |
| 4) | THE BODY: the body as a material / organized and social object / historical object (clothing, nudity, secularization of the body, anthropometry, normative body) | - |
| 5) | BODY / SPACE: Body-space studies at Bauhaus school via Oskar Schlemmer and Siegfried Ebeling / transcription of movement (chronophotograph / long exposure) / body-space studies in contemporary art and design / body manipulation | - |
| 6) | SPACE / BODY: examples of installation art where spaces are formed, constructed, transformed or destroyed by the human body | - |
| 7) | SUMMARY / DISCUSSION / Q & A | - |
| 8) | MIDTERM EXAM | - |
| 9) | REPRESENTATION I: architectural representation as a means of thinking, producing and communication: meaning, history, representation types | HOMEWORK: The slides sent to students regarding the title "REPRESENTATION" will be examined once before coming to class. |
| 10) | REPRESENTATION II: scale, abstraction, paper architecture | READING: “Negatif Bir Deneyim Alanı Olarak Unbuilt” - 2021 - Bahar Avanoğlu |
| 11) | MODERNITY: The Distinction between Premodern - Modern, The Effects of Modernity | READING: "All That Is Solid Melts into Air" - 1982 - Marshall Berman |
| 12) | UTOPIA: Discussion on Utopias | READING: "UTOPIA" - 1516 - Thomas More |
| 13) | ARCHITECTURE & UTOPIA: Programs and Manifestos | READING: "Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture" - 1975 - Ulrich Conrads; "Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture" - 1977 - Robert Venturi |
| 14) | SUMMARY / DISCUSSION / Q & A | - |
| 15) | FINAL EXAM | - |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | 1- Pallasmaa, J. (2011). Tenin Gözleri. İstanbul, YEM Yayın. 2- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996) Göz ve Tin. İstanbul, Metis Yayınları. 3- Berger J. (1986) Görme Biçimleri. İstanbul, Metis Yayınları. 4- A Blind Perspective (2008) / Yön: Matthew Marsh [KISA FİLM] 5- An Extraordinary Place (2015) / Yön: Valentina D'Annunzio [KISA FİLM] 6- Perfect Sense (2011) / Yön: David Mackenzie [UZUN METRAJLI FİLM] |
| References: | 1-Havenhand, L. K., 2004. A View from the Margin: Interior Design, Design Issues , Autumn, 2004, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 32-42. 2-White, Allison C., 2009. What’s in a Name? Interior Design and/or Interior Architecture: The Discussion Continues, Journal of Interior Design, 35 (1) 3-Waxman, L. K., & Clemons, S. (2007). Student Perceptions: Debunking Television’s Portrayal of Interior Design, Journal of Interior Design, 32(2), v–xi. 4-https://www.timesofisrael.com/accusations-fly-amid-big-brother-medications-scandal/ 5-Pallasmaa, J. (2011). Tenin Gözleri. İstanbul, YEM Yayın. Sontag, S. (1973). On Photography. New York, RosettaBooks LLC. 6-Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996) Göz ve Tin. İstanbul, Metis Yayınları. 7-Berger J. (1986) Görme Biçimleri. İstanbul, Metis Yayınları. 8-Şahin, S. (2015). Mimari Tasarım Stüdyosunda Mimari Temsilde “Kişiselleşme”. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, (Danışman: Prof. Dr. Ayşe Şentürer) 9-https://www.archisoup.com/studio-guide/architectural-diagrams 10-https://archinect.com/news/article/54767042/drawing-architecture-conversation-with-perry-kulper 11-http://www.larissafassler.com/schlosszoom_3.html 12-Ed. Gray M., Limon H., Ewer D. & Shilland H. (2011). The Art of Mapping. London, ArtQuarters Press. 13-Wigglesworth S. & Till J. (1998). The Everyday and Architecture. In: Wigglesworth, Sarah and Till, Jeremy, (eds.) The everyday and architecture. London, U.K. : Architectural Design. pp. 6-9. 14-Davids R. (1999). Serial Vision: Storyboards in the Design Studio. 87th ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings. p. 239-245. 15-Wahid A. R. & Atmodiwirjo P. (2018). Storyboard as a Representation of Urban Architectural Settings. SHS Web of Conferences 41. 16-Panofsky E. (2013/1927). Perspektif, Simgesel bir Biçim. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. 17-Şentürk L. ( 2012). Bedenin Tarihi İçin bir Giriş. Mesele Dergisi. Aralık, 72, s.32-35. 18-Daniel R. (2021). Introduction (in Thinking the Body-Inside). Journal of Interior Design, 46 (1), p.3-9. 19-Corbin A., Courtine J.J., Vigarello G. (2021). Bedenin Tarihi I. çev. Özen S., Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul. 20-Ceylan E. (2019). Bau(dy)haus: Bauhaus’un İdealleri Bağlamında Beden ve Mekan İlişkisi. Mimarist, sayı: 2, s. 31-41. 21-https://socks-studio.com/2017/07/19/when-body-draws-the-abstract-space-slat-dance-by-oskar-schlemmer/ 22-Body and Space Research Lab, The Swedish School of Textiles. https://www.bodyandspace.com/ 23-http://www.numen.eu/installations/tape/des-moines/ 24-https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/i/installation-art 25-http://portico.space/journal//drawing-for-architects-basics-scale 26.https://web.archive.org/web/20150405133558/http://loop1.aiga.org/content.cfm?ContentID=30 27-Saev D. (2017). Demystifying Abstraction: In the Context of Architectural Education. 28-Ghom P. V. (2017). Use of Abstraction in Architectural Design Process (in First Year Design Studio). International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, Volume 10, Number 1, p: 118-122. |
Course - Program Learning Outcome Relationship
| Course Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes |
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Average | 3 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Midterms | 1 | % 40 |
| Final | 1 | % 60 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
| total | % 100 | |
Workload and ECTS Credit Calculation
| Activities | Number of Activities | Preparation for the Activity | Spent for the Activity Itself | Completing the Activity Requirements | Workload | ||
| Course Hours | 13 | 0 | 2 | 26 | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 1 | 0 | 18 | 18 | |||
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 15 | 15 | ||||
| Midterms | 1 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Final | 1 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Total Workload | 73 | ||||||