Turkish Language and Literature | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code: | TDE011 | ||||
Course Name: | Turkish Language Studies in Modernization Period | ||||
Semester: |
Fall Spring |
||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||
Language of instruction: | Turkish | ||||
Course Condition: | |||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||
Type of course: | Departmental Elective | ||||
Course Level: |
|
||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||
Course Coordinator: | Dr. Öğr. Üy. FEYZİ ÇİMEN | ||||
Course Lecturer(s): | - | ||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | Describing the works of the Turkish Writing Revolution. Explaining the Tanzimat Period Language and Writing Discussions, Constitutional Monarchy Language and Writing Discussions, Early Republican Language and Writing Discussions Knowing the place and value of the Sun Language Theory and Turkish History Thesis. |
Course Content: | The concept of modernization, the effect of modernization period on Turkish and the studies carried out in this period. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) Learning the concept of modernization, the effect of modernization period on Turkish and studies of this period. 2) Defining the works of Turkish Writing Revolution. 3) Knowing the language and writing discussions of Tanzimat Period, Constitutional Monarchy language and writing discussions, Early Republican Language and Writing Discussions. 4) The student knows the place and value of the Sun-Language Theory in Turkish Language Thesis and Turkish History Thesis. 5) Learning the acceptance of new Turkish letters. |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | The Concept of Modernization Turkish Writing Revolution | |
2) | Tanzimat Period Language and Writing Discussions | |
3) | Language and Writing Discussions in Constitutional Monarchy Period | |
4) | Early Republican Language and Writing Discussions | |
5) | Acceptance of New Turkish Letters | |
6) | Language as a Social Engineering Tool | |
7) | General Review | |
8) | Exam | |
9) | Establishment of Turkish Language Institution and Discussions on Language | |
10) | Sun Language Theory | |
11) | The Place and Value of Sun-Language Theory in Turkish History Thesis | |
12) | Language Discussions in Turkish Journal of Language | |
13) | Turkish as a Language of Science, Culture and Instruction | |
14) | General Review |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | 1) Doğan Aksan, Her Yönüyle Dil-III, Ankara 1990, s. 47. 2) Mustafa Özkan, "Lisanımız ve İnsanımız", Kubbealtı Akademi Mecmuası, Nisan 1998, S. 2, s. 53. 3) Zeynep Korkmaz, Türk Dili Üzerine Araştırmalar, Birinci Cilt, TDK yay., Ankara 1995, s. 789. 4) Zeynep Korkmaz, Atatürk ve Türk Dili-BELGELER, TDK yay., Ankara 1992, s. 6) Bernard LEWIS, Modern Türkiye'nin Doğuşu, TTK Basım Evi, Ankara 1993, s. 276; 428. 7) İ. Necmi Dilmen, "Türk Tarih Tezinde Güneş-Dil Teorisinin Yeri ve Değeri", II. Türk Tarih Kongresi Tutanakları, 20-25 Eylül 1937, TTK yay., İstanbul 1943, s. 85. 8) Faruk K. Timurtaş, "Türkçe'nin Bozulması", Türk Edebiyatı İstanbul 1980 s. 80, s. 7. 9) ) Faruk K. Timurtaş, "Dil Bayramı mı Matem mi?", Tercüman, 28. 8. 1970. 10) Emin Özdemir, "Türk Dili Dergisinde Dil Tartışmaları", Türk Dili, 1981, s. 198. 11) Tahsin Banguoğlu, Dil Bahisleri, Kubbealtı Neşriyatı, İstanbul 1987, s. 295. |
References: | 1) Doğan Aksan, Her Yönüyle Dil-III, Ankara 1990, s. 47. 2) Mustafa Özkan, "Lisanımız ve İnsanımız", Kubbealtı Akademi Mecmuası, Nisan 1998, S. 2, s. 53. 3) Zeynep Korkmaz, Türk Dili Üzerine Araştırmalar, Birinci Cilt, TDK yay., Ankara 1995, s. 789. 4) Zeynep Korkmaz, Atatürk ve Türk Dili-BELGELER, TDK yay., Ankara 1992, s. 6) Bernard LEWIS, Modern Türkiye'nin Doğuşu, TTK Basım Evi, Ankara 1993, s. 276; 428. 7) İ. Necmi Dilmen, "Türk Tarih Tezinde Güneş-Dil Teorisinin Yeri ve Değeri", II. Türk Tarih Kongresi Tutanakları, 20-25 Eylül 1937, TTK yay., İstanbul 1943, s. 85. 8) Faruk K. Timurtaş, "Türkçe'nin Bozulması", Türk Edebiyatı İstanbul 1980 s. 80, s. 7. 9) ) Faruk K. Timurtaş, "Dil Bayramı mı Matem mi?", Tercüman, 28. 8. 1970. 10) Emin Özdemir, "Türk Dili Dergisinde Dil Tartışmaları", Türk Dili, 1981, s. 198. 11) Tahsin Banguoğlu, Dil Bahisleri, Kubbealtı Neşriyatı, İstanbul 1987, s. 295. |
Course Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | ||||||||||||||
1) Knows grammatical features of Turkish language. | ||||||||||||||
2) Have knowledge of examining the properties of Turkish within the framework of universal linguistics rules. | ||||||||||||||
3) Establishes the relationship between language and literature, active writing and interpretation activities. | ||||||||||||||
4) Uses computer software, and information and communication technologies at least at the European Computer Driving License Basic Level. | ||||||||||||||
5) Uses Turkish in terms of intonation and emphasis aesthetically; writes accurate, comprehensible, effective articles in terms of spelling and punctuation. | ||||||||||||||
6) Knows and uses the current information and resources in the field. | ||||||||||||||
7) Understands the historical and modern Turkish texts written with different alphabets, transmits them to modern Turkish. | ||||||||||||||
8) Uses the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of Turkish language and literature in other fields of social sciences. | ||||||||||||||
9) Have knowledge of analyzing and evaluating literary works belonging to classical and modern periods with comparative methods. | ||||||||||||||
10) Examine and evaluate the Turkish works in the social and cultural context. | ||||||||||||||
11) Uses a foreign language at B1 General Level at least in terms of European Language Portfolio criteria. | ||||||||||||||
12) Makes interpretation, commentary, interpretation, analysis and analysis by using traditional methods used in understanding, explaining and interpreting the old Turkish literature texts. | ||||||||||||||
13) Uses philological, etymological and semantic approaches to understanding texts. | ||||||||||||||
14) Respects social, cultural and individual differences, universal values and human rights in scientific and professional activities. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Average | 3 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Knows grammatical features of Turkish language. | 3 |
2) | Have knowledge of examining the properties of Turkish within the framework of universal linguistics rules. | 3 |
3) | Establishes the relationship between language and literature, active writing and interpretation activities. | |
4) | Uses computer software, and information and communication technologies at least at the European Computer Driving License Basic Level. | |
5) | Uses Turkish in terms of intonation and emphasis aesthetically; writes accurate, comprehensible, effective articles in terms of spelling and punctuation. | |
6) | Knows and uses the current information and resources in the field. | |
7) | Understands the historical and modern Turkish texts written with different alphabets, transmits them to modern Turkish. | |
8) | Uses the knowledge and skills acquired in the field of Turkish language and literature in other fields of social sciences. | |
9) | Have knowledge of analyzing and evaluating literary works belonging to classical and modern periods with comparative methods. | 3 |
10) | Examine and evaluate the Turkish works in the social and cultural context. | 2 |
11) | Uses a foreign language at B1 General Level at least in terms of European Language Portfolio criteria. | |
12) | Makes interpretation, commentary, interpretation, analysis and analysis by using traditional methods used in understanding, explaining and interpreting the old Turkish literature texts. | |
13) | Uses philological, etymological and semantic approaches to understanding texts. | |
14) | Respects social, cultural and individual differences, universal values and human rights in scientific and professional activities. |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Midterms | 1 | % 50 |
Final | 1 | % 50 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Preparation for the Activity | Spent for the Activity Itself | Completing the Activity Requirements | Workload | ||
Course Hours | 13 | 2 | 3 | 65 | |||
Midterms | 1 | 13 | 2 | 15 | |||
Final | 1 | 14 | 2 | 16 | |||
Total Workload | 96 |