Architecture (DR) | |||||
PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 |
Course Code: | MIM6101 | ||||
Course Name: | Design and Methodology | ||||
Semester: | Fall | ||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||
Language of instruction: | Turkish | ||||
Course Condition: | |||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||
Type of course: | Compulsory Courses | ||||
Course Level: |
|
||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||
Course Coordinator: | Dr. Öğr. Üy. ZEHRA TONBUL | ||||
Course Lecturer(s): | Uğur Tanyeli, Zehra Tonbul | ||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | Aims graduate students to: 1. Approach architecture as an intellectual and critical field, 2. Produce architectural thought together with other disciplinary thoughts, 3. Develop the ability to discuss current design problems and propose creative solutions, 4. Evaluate new technical/technological opportunities in terms of architecture, 5. Develop new approaches to transform new mathematical thinking into practice in architecture, 6. Generate global and decolonial architectural thought, 7. Develop ideas on designing and producing architecture in the context of the contemporary environment of Turkey. |
Course Content: | The course focuses on questioning the sources of architectural thought. Opens architectural studies to discussion as an interdisciplinary field. For this purpose, the course is shaped by questions around the place of architecture between science and art and its relationship with social sciences, literature and cultural studies. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) To be able to view architecture other than a construction practice, mainly as an intellectual and critical practice 2) To be able to comprehend and produce architectural thought within a trans-disciplinary framework 3) To be able to view and produce architecture as an academic practice 4) To be able to develop social cooperation and participation practices in architecture 5) To gain skills in creative architectural representation |
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Introduction | |
2) | Is Architecture a science? |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Cornelie Leopold, Christopher Robeller, Ulrike Weber, Research Culture in Architecture: Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration, Birkhäuser, 2019. |
References: | Pérez, Gómez A. Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1983. Introduction. Bruno, Giuliana. Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. New York: Verso, 2018. A Geography of the Moving Image: 165-211 Rendell, Jane. Art and Architecture: A Place between. London: I.B. Tauris, 2008. Introduction:12-30. Shiner, Larry E. The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. [Larry Shiner, Sanatın İcadı: Bir Kültür Tarihi. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2004] Foster, Hal. The Art-Architecture Complex. London: Verso, 2011. LeFebvre, H. Mekânın Üretimi (çev. Işık Ergüder). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık, 2015. Mendes, Maria M, Teresa Sá, and João Cabral. Architecture and the Social Sciences: Inter- and Multidisciplinary Approaches between Society and Space. Cham: Springer, 2018. Spurr, David. Architecture and Modern Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012. Introduction (Meaning in Architecture and Literature). Michel Foucault. Of Other Spaces (1967), Heterotopias. Benjamin W., Asja Lacis, Naples. Leach. N. Introduction. Architecture and Revolution. Routledge. 1999. Boym, Svetlana, Tatlin’s Techne and Revolutionary Ruins, Architecture of the Off-Modern, 8-15. Roland Barthes, Bir Deneme Bir Ders - Eiffel Kulesi ve Açılış Dersi Barthes, Müellifin Ölümü |
Course Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | |||||
1) To be able to comprehend and critically analyse contemporary changes in architectural practice | 3 | 2 | |||
2) To gain the ability to comprehend and interpret the integration of architecture and engineering | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
3) To understand the dialogue between architecture and social sciences and conduct studies utilizing the potentials of this dialogue | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
4) To acknowledge the theoretical dimension of architecture as an inherent component of the practice | 3 | 3 | |||
5) To develop an ability to accommodate architectural knowledge based on personal academic interests | 3 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Average | 3 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | To be able to comprehend and critically analyse contemporary changes in architectural practice | 3 |
2) | To gain the ability to comprehend and interpret the integration of architecture and engineering | 2 |
3) | To understand the dialogue between architecture and social sciences and conduct studies utilizing the potentials of this dialogue | 3 |
4) | To acknowledge the theoretical dimension of architecture as an inherent component of the practice | 2 |
5) | To develop an ability to accommodate architectural knowledge based on personal academic interests | 3 |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Presentation | 1 | % 30 |
Final | 1 | % 70 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 30 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 70 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 28 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 112 |
Presentations / Seminar | 3 | 15 |
Homework Assignments | 2 | 10 |
Total Workload | 165 |