| Architectural Design (Master) (with Thesis) | |||||
| Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 | ||
| Course Code: | MIM5017 | ||||
| Course Name: | Conservation Theory | ||||
| Semester: |
Fall Spring |
||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||
| Language of instruction: | Turkish | ||||
| Course Condition: | |||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||
| Type of course: | Departmental Elective | ||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||
| Course Coordinator: | Dr. Öğr. Üy. ERKAN KAMBEK | ||||
| Course Lecturer(s): | Erkan KAMBEK | ||||
| Course Assistants: |
| Course Objectives: | Today, many architects challenge modern conservation principles and architectural dogmas with the projects they design. In this course, we aim to explore and conceptualize what experimental, innovative or controversial architectural strategies are used to reuse and transform existing buildings, structures and landscapes. We also seek new theoretical and operational approaches that question conventions about how current architectural practice relates to the existing built environment and heritage. |
| Course Content: | The course begins by examining the history of conservation and restoration theory. In the continuation of this, the theoretical approaches of the architectural dimension of the conservation and restoration issue will be examined. The principles of evaluating the existing building stock, whether registered or not, will be discussed. Our experience of almost a century in Turkey, starting from the 1950s and extending to the present, will be evaluated. The reflections of the theoretical approach of conservation and restoration in practice will be presented through examples. |
|
The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) To have knowledge about the history of conservation theory 2) Generating concepts for the assessment of existing building stock 3) To be able to discuss conservation theory judgments through sample applications. |
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction of the course and explanation of mutual assignments and tasks | |
| 2) | Conservation theory 101 | |
| 3) | Development of conservation theory - Premodern | |
| 4) | Development of conservation theory - Early 20 th century | |
| 5) | Development of conservation theory - After WW 2 | |
| 6) | Current conservation debates | |
| 7) | Determining the study subjects of the students | |
| 8) | Developing study subjects with students 1 | |
| 9) | Developing study subjects with students 2 | |
| 10) | Developing study subjects with students 3 | |
| 11) | Presentation of students 1 | |
| 12) | Presentation of students 2 | |
| 13) | Presentation of students 3 | |
| 14) | Evaluation and discussion of studies |
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Tarihi Çevre Korumanın Mimarlık Boyutu - Kuram ve Uygulama. Doğan KUBAN |
| References: | On Altering Architecture. Fred Scott Experimental Preservation. ed. Jorge Otero-Pailos, Erik Langdalen and Thordis Arrhenius Meskell, L. (2018). A future in ruins: UNESCO, world heritage, and the dream of peace. Oxford University Press. Orbasli, A., & Vellinga, M. (Eds.). (2020). Architectural Regeneration. John Wiley & Sons. Roders, A. P., & Bandarin, F. (Eds.). (2019). Reshaping urban conservation: the historic urban landscape approach in action (Vol. 2). Springer. Stone, S. (2019). UnDoing buildings: Adaptive reuse and cultural memory. Routledge. Glendinning, M. (2013). The conservation movement: a history of architectural preservation: antiquity to modernity. Routledge. Konunun nerelere gidebileceğini gösteren makaleler; Kiruthu, F. Revisited, Modernism, Conservation and Tradition in the 21st Century. He co-authored Nairobi: An Architectural Jubilee 1963–2013 (Vol. 1). Jasper, A., & Otero-Pailos, J. (2016). Smell and preservation. Future Anterior, 13(2), iii-vii. Otero-Pailos, J. (2020). In Notre-Dame, We Find a Heritage That Invites Us to Breathe and Reflect: A Spire Competition Is the Wrong Approach. Future Anterior, 17(1), 75-78. Tan, B., & Arabacıoğlu, F. P. (2020). Architectural Design in Historical Areas: Urban Regeneration Areas in İstanbul//Tarihi Çevrede Mimari Tasarım: İstanbul Yenileme Alanları. Megaron, 15(2), 204. Ahunbay, Z. (2019). Kültür mirasını koruma ilke ve teknikleri. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları. Çeşitli Yazarlar (2021). Dosya: Tarihi Yarımada’nın Hal-i Pür Meali: Yıkımlar, İhyalar, Kazılar, Restorasyonlar..., Mimar.ist, 72, 44-89. |
| Course Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes | |||||||||
| 1) To see architecture as a transdisciplinary intellectual and critical field | |||||||||
| 2) To develop the ability to express architectural thought with appropriate terminology, verbally and in writing. | |||||||||
| 3) To learn and use the necessary tools to share the results of their research and current developments in architectural design with different groups in different platforms. | |||||||||
| 4) To develop the ability to discuss current design problems and propose creative solutions. | |||||||||
| 5) To follow, understand and apply current research methods in architectural design and to produce new research methods. | |||||||||
| 6) To evaluate new technical/technological developments in terms of architecture, to recognize hybrid applications and creative practices and to develop a critical perspective. | |||||||||
| 7) To develop approaches to transform new mathematical thinking into practice in architecture. | |||||||||
| 8) To be able to independently design and conduct research processes based on data collection, interpretation and announcement in the field of architectural design, within the framework of ethical values and rules | |||||||||
| 9) To be able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in architectural design, to be a leader in environments that require solving problems related to architectural design. | |||||||||
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Average | 3 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | To see architecture as a transdisciplinary intellectual and critical field | |
| 2) | To develop the ability to express architectural thought with appropriate terminology, verbally and in writing. | |
| 3) | To learn and use the necessary tools to share the results of their research and current developments in architectural design with different groups in different platforms. | |
| 4) | To develop the ability to discuss current design problems and propose creative solutions. | |
| 5) | To follow, understand and apply current research methods in architectural design and to produce new research methods. | |
| 6) | To evaluate new technical/technological developments in terms of architecture, to recognize hybrid applications and creative practices and to develop a critical perspective. | |
| 7) | To develop approaches to transform new mathematical thinking into practice in architecture. | |
| 8) | To be able to independently design and conduct research processes based on data collection, interpretation and announcement in the field of architectural design, within the framework of ethical values and rules | |
| 9) | To be able to independently carry out a work that requires expertise in architectural design, to be a leader in environments that require solving problems related to architectural design. |
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | % 20 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 20 |
| Final | 1 | % 60 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
| total | % 100 | |
| Activities | Number of Activities | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 42 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 70 |
| Final | 5 | 50 |
| Total Workload | 162 | |